Office Location is Irving, Texas and Albuquerque, New Mexico
Concerned about immigration issues following President Donald Trump's re-election? Click Here
Office Location is Irving, Texas and Albuquerque, New Mexico
In the early days of his second term, President Donald Trump enacted a series of executive orders and policy changes aimed at strengthening U.S. border security. These initiatives include the reinstatement of the “Remain in Mexico” policy, the termination of certain humanitarian parole programs, and the expansion of detention facilities. While proponents argue that these measures are essential for national security, critics contend that they exacerbate humanitarian crises and overextend resources. Immigration attorneys play a crucial role in assisting individuals affected by these developments.
The Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), commonly known as the “Remain in Mexico” policy, require asylum seekers to stay in Mexico while awaiting U.S. immigration court hearings. This in January 2025 as part of a broader strategy to deter illegal immigration. Asylum seekers are now mandated to wait in Mexican border towns, often under precarious conditions, until their court dates.
The administration has terminated specific humanitarian parole programs that previously allowed migrants temporary entry into the U.S. under urgent humanitarian circumstances. This move affects programs such as the Central American Minors (CAM) program, which permitted children from certain countries to reunite with their parents in the U.S. The cessation of these programs leaves many vulnerable individuals without legal avenues to seek refuge.
To accommodate the anticipated increase in detentions resulting from stricter enforcement policies, the administration plans to expand detention facilities, including the use of the Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center. The Department of Homeland Security has proposed increasing the capacity of this facility to house up to 30,000 migrants. This expansion has raised concerns regarding the adequacy of resources and the conditions within these facilities.
Asylum seekers subjected to the “Remain in Mexico” policy face significant obstacles in securing legal representation. Being outside the U.S. complicates access to attorneys, legal resources, and the ability to prepare for court proceedings. This situation raises due process concerns, as legal representation is critical to a fair immigration system.
The reinstatement of MPP and the expansion of detention facilities pose substantial humanitarian and public health risks. Migrants waiting in Mexican border towns often encounter unsafe living conditions, including exposure to crime and inadequate shelter. Within detention centers, overcrowding and limited access to medical care heighten the risk of disease transmission and other health issues.
The increased enforcement measures place additional burdens on border communities in both the U.S. and Mexico. Local governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are strained as they attempt to provide services to the growing number of migrants. Resources such as housing, healthcare, and legal assistance are in higher demand, leading to economic and social challenges for these communities.
The administration’s border security initiatives have prompted legal challenges from various advocacy groups and state governments. Lawsuits argue that policies like MPP violate both U.S. and international laws regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. Previous court decisions have blocked similar policies, setting legal precedents that may influence the outcome of current challenges.
In response to the administration’s actions, Congress is experiencing heightened debate over immigration policy. Some lawmakers support increased funding for border security and stricter enforcement, while others advocate for comprehensive immigration reform that addresses root causes of migration and provides pathways to citizenship. The executive branch continues to issue directives to implement its border security agenda, further fueling the political discourse.
The U.S.’s intensified border enforcement measures have implications for its relationships with neighboring countries, particularly Mexico. Policies like MPP require cooperation from the Mexican government, which may face domestic pressure and resource constraints. Additionally, mass deportations can strain diplomatic relations with countries of origin, especially if they are unprepared to receive large numbers of returnees.
Immigration attorneys are essential in providing legal representation to individuals affected by these policy changes. They assist clients in understanding their rights, navigating complex legal processes, and advocating on their behalf in court. Attorneys also play a critical role in challenging unlawful policies and practices through litigation.
Beyond legal representation, immigration attorneys often connect clients with vital resources, including housing, healthcare, and social services. They collaborate with NGOs and community organizations to ensure that migrants receive comprehensive support during their legal proceedings.
Attorneys contribute to policy advocacy by participating in public discourse, providing expert testimony, and working with lawmakers to promote fair and just immigration policies. They also engage in public education efforts to raise awareness about the impacts of border security initiatives and the importance of due process and human rights.
At John W. Lawit, LLC, our experienced immigration attorneys in Albuquerque, NM as well as throughout Texas are here to guide you through complex border security policies, asylum claims, and detention challenges. Whether you’re facing legal obstacles due to the “Remain in Mexico” policy, visa denials, or detention issues, we are committed to protecting your rights and securing the best possible outcome for your case.
Your future in the U.S. matters—let us help you take the next step. Contact us today for a free and confidential consultation.
